Drag

Living In a World With

Automated Prior Authorizations

Author’s Corner


In this white paper, Mark Kausel, Director Client Services, IT, discusses the inefficiencies and challenges of the current prior authorization process, highlighting its impact on costs, care delivery, and patient outcomes. He emphasizes the need for a more efficient, automated solution to handle prior authorization requests in real time and reduce delays.

Please click on the video to the right to learn more about the author, his paper’s key takeaways, and his motivation for writing on this subject.

To discuss this white paper in detail, please reach out to Mark using the contact information provided at the bottom of the page.

Everyone acknowledges that the US healthcare system has many inefficiencies that drive costs up and impede the delivery of care. The current prior authorization (PA) process is a perfect example of this as it is fraught with issues that create higher costs, frustration for care providers, and more importantly can lead to adverse outcomes when patients are not treated timely and judiciously.

Meet Maryann. She faced significant delays in receiving a crucial cancer treatment due to prior authorization requirements by her health insurance company. Maryanne, diagnosed with ovarian cancer, required a specific chemotherapy drug prescribed by her oncologist. However, a prior authorization needed to be obtained from the health plan, which took several long weeks to process. During this time, Maryanne's condition deteriorated, and the cancer spread, necessitating more aggressive treatment when the authorization finally came through.

quality-of-care

The more aggressive treatment led to Maryanne enduring more pain, suffering, anxiety, and a much longer recovery. It meant she was away from work longer, and the cost of the treatment was higher. This scenario and scenarios like this one are easily preventable with timely authorization approval. Even better, imagine a world where the authorization is not needed in the first place.

Each year, the American Medical Association (AMA) conducts a nationwide survey of 1,000 practicing physicians to understand the impact the PA process has on patients, physicians, employers, and overall healthcare spending. The information below summarizes some of the results of the 2023 AMA prior authorization physician survey:1

Patient Impact:

  • 94% of physicians report delays in necessary patient care.
  • 78% of physicians report that the requirement for PAs leads to treatment delays.
  • More than 1 in 3 (35%) physicians report that PA criteria are rarely or never evidence-based.
  • Nearly 1 in 4 (24%) report that delays in PAs have led to a serious adverse event for a patient in their care.

Physician Impact:

  • More than 1 in 4 (27%) physicians report that PAs are often or always denied.
  • Fewer than 1 in 5 (18%) physicians report that they always appeal an adverse PA decision.
    • 62% report they do not believe an appeal will be successful based on past experience.
    • 48% report that patient care cannot wait for the health plan to approve the PA.
    • 48% report that they have insufficient practice staff resources/time.

The Cost Impact of PAs:

  • 87% of physicians reported that PA leads to higher overall healthcare utilization rates.
    • 69% report ineffective initial treatment (e.g., due to step therapy requirements).
    • 68% report the need for additional office visits.
    • 42% report immediate care and ER visits.
    • 29% report hospitalizations.
  • 79% report that the PA process at least sometimes leads patients to pay out of pocket for a medication.
  • 53% of physicians with patients in the workforce report that PA has impacted patient job performance.

The administrative burden, the added cost of care, and the adverse impact on patients continues to be a crisis. The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued its final rule, CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization (CMS-0057-F), to advance interoperability and improve the prior authorization process. This rule requires “impacted payers” to “implement and maintain certain Health Level 7® (HL7®) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR®) application programming interfaces (APIs) to improve the electronic exchange of health care data, as well as to streamline prior authorization processes.”2

These requirements will slowly have an impact on making the prior authorization process more efficient, reducing the administrative burden on providers and enabling patients to get the care they need when and where it is most appropriate.

Let’s take a moment to understand the current process that consists of the four main steps illustrated below:

Proposed Solution Graph

By looking at this convoluted process flow, it is evident that there is a huge need to move from the segmented, manual processes with all the “hoops that need to be jumped through” before patients like Maryanne can receive the care they need to a seamless, automated solution.

Imagine Living in a World Where the Entire Prior Authorization Process was Automated…


While at her appointment, Maryanne’s oncologist writes the order for the specific chemotherapy drug and treatment. Immediately, the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) sends an electronic message to Maryanne’s insurance company.

The payer responds in real time, confirming Maryanne has insurance coverage and that the chemotherapy drug and treatment require prior authorization. Then, leveraging artificial intelligence, an Intelligent Automation Platform (IAP) determines what information is required to successfully obtain the authorization approval for the treatment, packaging it up and sending it to the payer electronically.

At the payer, the authorization request is reviewed using artificial intelligence to read the request and make a determination based on the care guidelines created through evidence-based medicine. Without human intervention, the authorization is approved and communicated back to the Intelligent Automation Platform and EMR… all while Maryanne is sitting in the appointment with her oncologist!

Is This New World Possible?


The CMS rule that was released earlier this year sets the stage for this new world by requiring the exchange of information electronically to streamline the process and shorten the time to make determinations. While the requirements need to be met by January 1, 2027, for government payers, commercial payers typically follow in similar timeframes. In the shorter term, an Intelligent Automation Platform can be levereged to streamline the process.

Here are Some Examples of how Vee Healthtek’s IAP Can Work Today:


  • Insurance verification and benefit eligibility – real time eligibility (RTE) is available today and leverages ANSI X12 (270/271) transaction sets. These messages are supported by most payers.
  • Leverage AI to scan the medical record and leverage a database that tracks requirements by payer. Until the ANSI X12 (278/275) transaction sets are modified and more broadly supported by payers, the Intelligent Automation Platform can use Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to submit authorization requests with the required and recommended documentation to streamline the process. Responses will be received and documented by the IAP in the EMR using APIs or RPA.

By leveraging an Intelligent Automation Platform, Vee Healthtek streamlines the prior authorization process even today to effectively manage different technologies (i.e., AI, RPA, NLP, etc.) and human intervention when required to move a prior authorization through to completion seamlessly. Creating a standardized and automated prior authorization process will happen, but there are many silos of information, stakeholders (payers, providers, and patients), and differences in agendas that must be aligned for that to happen.

CMS has provided a framework and incentives to move the US healthcare system in that direction, but it will be a crawl. In the meantime, Vee Healthtek will continue to leverage Intelligent Automation to help its clients achieve this goal today, ultimately benefiting patients.

References:

12023 AMA prior authorization physician survey

2CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule CMS-0057-F, January 17. 2024

Mark Kausel

Meet the Author

Mark Kausel - Director Client Services, IT

Mark Kausel applies over 30 years of experience from healthcare operations, information technology, and sales and account management roles to deliver strategic solutions to client challenges resulting in positive outcomes with long-term relationships.